RaboResearch - Economic Research

Country Report Mozambique

Country Report

Share:

Mozambique flag

Recent natural resource discoveries support brisk economic growth in Mozambique - an excellent opportunity for the country to tackle its large infrastructural and institutional deficits, and to change its status of a global laggard in human development - if the wealth is managed wisely.

Strengths (+) and weaknesses (-)

(+) Generous natural endowment

Large gas reserves, abundant mineral resources, vast agricultural land and a tourism friendly landscape give Mozambique a solid base for economic development and for attracting investments.

(-) Low level of development

Widespread poverty and extremely low development expose Mozambique to a high risk of social unrest. Youth predominance (66% is younger than 25) amplifies this risk. Furthermore, the huge infrastructural deficit and the weak institutions constrain economic and business development.

(-) Economic susceptibility to weather conditions

Weather calamities (that occur often) affect output in agriculture and across the board, through disruptions of transportation and electricity supply. Higher food prices and imports push up inflationary pressures.

(-) Narrow export base

Despite diversification away from aluminum, Mozambican exports are still mainly accounted for by commodities and are therefore susceptible to high volatility in the international markets.

Key developments

1. The mineral and hydrocarbon resources – a blessing or a curse?

Based on recent discoveries of gas (150 trillion cubic feet) and coal (32 billion tons), Mozambique has the potential to become a leading exporter of both products. This potential attracted large amounts of foreign investments. FDI doubled from USD 2.6bn in 2011 to USD 5.2bn in 2012 (37% of GDP), making Mozambique the second largest destination for FDI in Africa, after Nigeria. Since these investments were mainly related to project development, huge imports of capital and know how caused the current account deficit to soar to 36% of GDP in 2012, from 24% of GDP in 2011. Consequently, the import cover deteriorated to 3.3 months, despite FX reserves having grown steadily in the past 5 years to USD 2.8bn in 2012. While the higher current account deficit increases reliance on external capital flows, the financing from FDI provides reasonable mitigation against a balance of payments or liquidity crisis. The resource bonanza is also set to benefit Mozambique in the medium to long term. The IMF estimates that economic growth from coal and gas could add an average of 2ppts per year to GDP in the next decade and that revenues from the sector could make up for 40% of government receipts by 2030.

Figure 1: Current account deficit up due to FDI
Figure 1: Current account deficit up due to FDISource: EIU
Figure 2: Public debt building up
Figure 2: Public debt building upSource: EIU

The natural resources potential has already raised the interest of many, including energy- thirsty Asian countries which are seeking closer ties with Mozambique. The country has already benefitted from debt forgiveness from Japan and Russia, and from windfall tax revenues on sales of stakes in the gas fields as Chinese, Thai and Indian companies joined in or increased their share. However, in the medium term there are several downside risks to Mozambique realizing its potential. First, the large infrastructural deficit could hinder developments, as indicated by progress in the coal sector where transportation is limiting exports way below production capacity and affecting investor interest. Second, inappropriate legislation could have the same impact. While it is positive that Mozambique is overhauling its regulation on income tax and the hydrocarbon sector to allow for higher local benefits, and that they consult with international organizations on the matter, persistent delays and ambiguities maintain uncertainty and could affect investor confidence. Third, deteriorating global commodity prices could affect the return on planned investments and cause delays or annulations, especially as new, more politically mature alternatives such as the United States and Australia come into the picture. Last, protests by local communities could hinder business development, since most of the resources are located in areas where poverty is above the national average and local expectations to benefit from the sectors are high.

2. Changing public debt structure increases debt risk profile

Mozambique’s fiscal deficit was 4.2% of GDP in 2012 and it is expected to more than double to 8.7% of GDP in 2013, pushing public debt to 42% of GDP in 2012 and to an expected 47% of GDP in 2013. That represents a significant upsurge in the level of public debt, since it is 50% higher than the 31% of GDP in 2008, after debt relief. On top of that, the structure has also changed. Gross donor aid saw a considerable drop, from 13.5% of GDP in 2010 to 8.8% of GDP in 2012, forcing the government to increasingly finance its expenses from more expensive non-concessional sources, both domestic and international. The external share currently amounts to USD 1.45bn (10% of GDP). The fact that most public debt is external (86%) and financed by official creditors (69%) provides comfort. But several developments raise concerns about future public debt sustainability. First, while Mozambique’s large infrastructural deficit justifies the capital spending, some recent project choices are questionable (e.g. the debut USD 500m international bond is meant for a fishing fleet with doubtful returns). Hopefully, the close cooperation with the IMF will restrain wasteful spending. Second, though the current appetite for Mozambican sovereign debt is high, it is motivated by the prospect of future, but yet uncertain revenues from the energy and coal sectors. Last, Mozambique’s aid dependency could become a problem for debt service or roll-over, if current governance concerns cause donors to disrupt assistance. Higher revenues from coal and gas production are expected to provide mitigation, but as mentioned, are yet uncertain.  All in all, Mozambique’s fiscal metrics remain sound, but it has a higher public debt risk profile.          

3. Political risk increases as conflict between main parties becomes violent

The post-war settlement of 1992 has been the subject of several negotiations between ruling Frelimo and the main opposition party, Renamo. However, recent talks about political inclusiveness - higher representation in the National Electoral Commission and higher economic participation for Renamo - have escalated into violence. Renamo is boycotting coming elections and its army wing has carried out a series of attacks in Sofala province since early 2013. Some of them targeted local but crucial transportation infrastructure, such as the North-South road and the coal export rail line, which affected economic activity through disruptions and deterred investors.  Rio Tinto temporarily suspended coal shipments and Russia’s VTB Group cancelled planned investments. The conflict is not expected to escalate into a new civil war or threaten national stability, but attacks will probably intensify locally around the time of the local (2013) and the national (2014) elections.

Factsheet of Mozambique
Factsheet of MozambiqueSource: EIU, CIA World Factbook, UN, World Economic Forum, Transparency International, Reporters Without Borders, World Bank.

Background information

Mozambique is a South East African country spread along the coast of the Indian Ocean. The country has seen robust economic performances in recent years, on the back of the extractive and energy sectors, which also represent the principal foreign exchange earners (57% of exports). The services sector accounts for the largest share of economic activity, but agriculture provides the lion’s share of employment (78%). The sector is dominated by subsistence farming, despite some diversification towards cash crops in recent years. Trade ties are close with neighbor South Africa- the main trade partner, an important source of foreign investments and of remittances from Mozambican emigrants. Furthermore, China has become an important trade partner and source of financial flows. A large infrastructural deficit has created a geographic economic divide in Mozambique, whereby activity is concentrated in the south, while the rest is highly reliant on subsistence farming. The concentration of natural resources in the center and north is set to change this. As indicators in the factsheet indicate, economic benefits have not trickled down. Mozambique is the third least developed country in the world according to the Human Development index. Poverty dispersion reflects the north-south divide, though its level is high nationwide. While freedom of expression is fairly respected, weak institutions allow for high corruption, poor governance and high levels of organized crime.

Weak opposition has allowed the ruling Frelimo to dominate the fairly stable political scene since the end of the civil war in 1992. Opposition parties Renamo and splinter MDM are especially popular in the center and north. Local elections are stalled for 20 November 2013 and national ones for 2014.

Economic indicators of Mozambique
Economic indicators of MozambiqueSource: EIU
Note: The balance of payments data for 2011 & 2012 was revised to include investments in the coal and gas sector projects.
Share:
Author(s)
Alexandra Dumitru
RaboResearch Global Economics & Markets Rabobank KEO
+31 30 21 60441

naar boven